Tracking large numbers of moving objects in an event processing system

ABSTRACT

Techniques for tracking large numbers of moving objects in an event processing system are provided. An input event stream can be received, where the events in the input event stream represent the movement of a plurality of geometries or objects. The input event stream can then be partitioned among a number of processing nodes of the event processing system, thereby enabling parallel processing of one or more continuous queries for tracking the objects. The partitioning can be performed such that each processing node is configured to track objects in a predefined spatial region, and the spatial regions for at least two nodes overlap. This overlapping window enables a single node to find, e.g., all of the objects within a particular distance of a target object, even if the target object is in the process of moving from the region of that node to the overlapping region of another node.

CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of, and claims the benefit ofand priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/360,650, filed Nov.23, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.14/883,815, filed Oct. 15, 2015, and patented as U.S. Pat. No.9,535,761, on Jan. 3, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 13/107,742, filed May 13, 2011, and patented asU.S. Pat. No. 9,189,280, on Nov. 17, 2015, the entire contents of whichare herein incorporated by reference for all purposes.

BACKGROUND

Embodiments of the present invention relate in general to eventprocessing, and in particular to techniques for tracking large numbersof moving objects in an event processing system.

Traditional database management systems (DBMSs) execute queries in a“one-off” fashion over finite, stored data sets. For example, atraditional DBMS will receive a request to execute a query from aclient, execute the query exactly once against one or more storeddatabase tables, and return a result set to the client.

In recent years, event processing systems have been developed that canexecute queries over streams of data rather than finite data sets. Sincethese streams (referred to herein as “event streams”) can comprise apotentially unbounded sequence of input events, an event processingsystem can execute a query over the streams in a continuous (rather thanone-off) manner. This allows the system to continually process newevents as they are received. Based on this processing, the eventprocessing system can provide an ongoing stream of results to a client.One example of such an event processing system is the Oracle ComplexEvent Processing (CEP) Server developed by Oracle Corporation.

Given their unique capabilities, event processing systems arewell-suited for enabling applications that require real-time or nearreal-time processing of streaming data. For instance, event processingsystems are particularly well-suited for building “spatial” applications(i.e., applications that require analysis of streams of spatial orgeographic location data). Examples of such spatial applications includegeographic information systems (GIS), location-enabled businessintelligence solutions, geomatics/telematics applications, and the like.Some event processing systems, such as the Oracle CEP Server, provide anextension mechanism for supporting specific spatial features/operations(e.g., spatial data indexing, proximity and overlap determinations,etc.). Information regarding such an extension mechanism can be found inU.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/949,081 (Atty. Docket No.021756-104800US), filed Nov. 18, 2010, titled “SPATIAL DATA CARTRIDGEFOR EVENT PROCESSING SYSTEMS,” the entire contents of which areincorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

One limitation with existing event processing systems that allow spatialoperations is that they generally cannot support the tracking of a verylarge number (e.g., greater than one million) of moving geometries orobjects. For example, consider use cases from the telematics marketwhere an application needs to (1) determine all of the vehicles impactedby certain traffic events, or (2) detect “buddies” close to a movingvehicle position, where there is an m to n relation between the numberof vehicles and buddies using other vehicles. If the total number ofvehicles in these use cases is in the range of millions, a conventionalevent processing system generally cannot index and keep track of all ofthe vehicles in an efficient manner.

BRIEF SUMMARY

Embodiments of the present invention provide techniques for trackinglarge numbers of moving objects in an event processing system. In oneset of embodiments, an input event stream can be received, where theevents in the input event stream represent the movement of a pluralityof geometries or objects. The input event stream can then be partitionedamong a number of processing nodes of the event processing system,thereby enabling parallel processing of one or more continuous queriesfor tracking the objects. In a particular embodiment, the partitioningcan be performed such that (1) each processing node is configured totrack objects in a predefined spatial region, and (2) the spatialregions for at least two nodes overlap. This overlapping window enablesa single node to find, e.g., all of the objects within a particulardistance of a target object, even if the target object is in the processof moving from the region of that node to the overlapping region ofanother node.

According to one embodiment of the present invention, a method isprovided that includes receiving, by a computer system, an input eventstream comprising a sequence of events, the sequence of eventsrepresenting the movement of a plurality of objects. The method furtherincludes partitioning, by the computer system, the input event streamamong a plurality of processing nodes to facilitate parallel tracking ofthe objects, where each processing node is configured to track objectsin a predefined spatial region, and where the predefined spatial regionsfor at least two processing nodes in the plurality of processing nodesoverlap.

In one embodiment, each event includes an identifier of an object and acurrent position of the object.

In one embodiment, partitioning the input event stream includes, foreach event, determining a subset of processing nodes in the plurality ofprocessing nodes configured to track objects in a predefined spatialregion that encompasses the current position of the object; and for eachprocessing node in the plurality of processing nodes: determiningwhether the processing node is in the subset; if the processing node isin the subset, determining whether to insert or update the event in arelation operated on by the processing node; and if the processing nodeis not in the subset, determining whether to delete the event from therelation operated on by the processing node.

In one embodiment, determining whether to insert or update the event inthe relation operated on by the processing node includes retrieving,from a bit vector stored for the processing node, a bit value associatedwith the object; if the bit value is zero, transmitting to theprocessing node a command for inserting the event into the relation andsetting the bit value to one; and if the bit value is one, transmittingto the processing node a command for updating the event in the stream.

In one embodiment, determining whether to delete the event from therelation operated on by the processing node includes retrieving, from abit vector stored for the processing node, a bit value associated withthe object; and if the bit value is one, transmitting to the processingnode a command for deleting the event from the relation and clearing thebit value to zero.

In one embodiment, the predefined spatial regions for the plurality ofprocessing nodes are indexed using an R-tree index.

In one embodiment, determining the subset of processing nodes includesperforming, based on the current position of the object, a search intothe R-tree index.

In one embodiment, the computer system is a load balancing node of anevent processing system.

In one embodiment, the sequence of events represent the movement of morethan one million distinct objects.

In one embodiment, the plurality of objects are motor vehicles.

In one embodiment, the predefined spatial regions for the plurality ofprocessing nodes are one-dimensional, two-dimensional, orthree-dimensional regions.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, anon-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon programcode executable by a processor is provided.

The program code includes code that causes the processor to receive aninput event stream comprising a sequence of events, the sequence ofevents representing the movement of a plurality of objects; and codethat causes the processor to partition the input event stream among aplurality of processing nodes to facilitate parallel tracking of theobjects, where each processing node is configured to track objects in apredefined spatial region, and where the predefined spatial regions forat least two processing nodes in the plurality of processing nodesoverlap.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, an eventprocessing system that comprises a load balancer node and a plurality ofprocessing nodes. The load balance node is configured to receive aninput event stream comprising a sequence of events, the sequence ofevents representing the movement of a plurality of objects; andpartition the input event stream among the plurality of processing nodesto facilitate parallel tracking of the objects, wherein each processingnode is configured to track objects in a predefined spatial region, andwherein the predefined spatial regions for at least two processing nodesin the plurality of processing nodes overlap.

The foregoing, together with other features and embodiments, will becomemore apparent when referring to the following specification, claims, andaccompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is a simplified block diagram of an event processing system inaccordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a simplified block diagram of a load balancing node inaccordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 3-6 are flow diagrams of a process for partitioning an input eventstream among a plurality of processing nodes in accordance with anembodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a simplified block diagram of a system environment inaccordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a simplified block diagram of a computer system in accordancewith an embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerousdetails are set forth in order to provide an understanding ofembodiments of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, toone of ordinary skill in the art that certain embodiments can bepracticed without some of these details.

Embodiments of the present invention provide techniques for trackinglarge numbers of moving objects in an event processing system. In oneset of embodiments, an input event stream can be received, where theevents in the input event stream represent the movement of a pluralityof geometries or objects. The input event stream can then be partitionedamong a number of processing nodes of the event processing system,thereby enabling parallel processing of one or more continuous queriesfor tracking the objects. In a particular embodiment, the partitioningcan be performed such that (1) each processing node is configured totrack objects in a predefined spatial region, and (2) the spatialregions for at least two nodes overlap. This overlapping window enablesa single node to find, e.g., all of the objects within a particulardistance of a target object, even if the target object is in the processof moving from the region of that node to the overlapping region ofanother node.

FIG. 1 is a simplified block diagram of an event processing system 100according to an embodiment of the present invention. Event processingsystem 100 can be implemented in hardware, software, or a combinationthereof. Unlike traditional DBMSs, event processing system 100 canprocess queries (i.e., “continuous queries”) in a continuous manner overpotentially unbounded, real-time event streams. For example, eventprocessing system 100 can receive one or more input event streams from asource (e.g., source 102), execute continuous queries against the inputevent streams, and generate one or more output event streams destinedfor a client (e.g., application 104). In a particular embodiment, eventprocessing system 100 can include a mechanism (such as the spatial datacartridge described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/949,081titled “SPATIAL DATA CARTRIDGE FOR EVENT PROCESSING SYSTEMS”) thatenables the system to process continuous queries that reference spatialdata types, method, fields, and the like.

As shown, event processing system 100 can include a load balancing node106 and one or more processing nodes 108-112. Although only a singleload balancing node and three processing nodes are depicted in FIG. 1,any number of such nodes can be supported.

In one set of embodiments, load balancing node 106 can be configured topartition an input event stream received from source 102 amongprocessing nodes 108-112, thereby enabling the processing nodes toexecute one or more continuous queries over the event stream inparallel. By way of example, if the input event stream comprises eventsE1 through E9, load balancing node 106 might decide to partition thestream such that events E1-E3 are handled by processing node 108, eventsE4-E6 are handled by processing node 110, and events E7-E9 are handledby processing node 112. In one embodiment, this partitioning can beaccomplished by inserting, updating, or deleting events into/fromrelations maintained by each processing node.

In the context of a spatial application, the input event stream receivedby load balancing node 106 from source 102 can include events thatcorrespond to the movement of a plurality of geometries or objects(e.g., people, motor vehicles, airplanes, etc.). In these embodiments,load balancing node 106 can partition the events among processing nodes108-112 based on location information, such that each processing node isresponsible for executing queries against a relation representing apredefined spatial region. In various embodiments, the predefinedspatial region can be a one-dimensional, two-dimensional, orthree-dimensional region. If the spatial application simply requires theidentification of non-moving objects in an area of interest (e.g., ageo-fencing use case), the spatial regions handled by each processingnode can be disjoint, and no special processing needs to be performed byload balancing node 106 to insert/update/delete events into therelations associated with the processing nodes—the relations willgenerally be static.

However, if the spatial application requires the tracking of movingobjects across an area of interest, the spatial regions handled byadjacent processing nodes can overlap to some extent. This overlappingwindow enables a single processing node to find, e.g., all of theobjects within a particular distance of a target object, even if thetarget object is in the process of moving from the region of that nodeto the overlapping region of another node. The processing performed byload balancing node 106 to enable partitioning across overlappingregions is described in greater detail below.

As described above, processing nodes 108-112 can each be configured toexecute one more continuous queries over some partition or subset of theinput event stream received from source 102. In the spatial context,processing nodes 108-112 can each be configured to execute one morecontinuous queries with respect to objects located in a predefinedspatial region. Further, to accommodate the tracking of moving objects,the spatial regions for two more processing nodes can overlap. In oneembodiment, processing nodes 108-112 can each correspond to a separateprocessor in a single machine. In other embodiments, processing nodes108-112 can each correspond to an event processing server instancerunning on a separate machine.

It should be appreciated that event processing system 100 of FIG. 1 isillustrative and not intended to limit embodiments of the presentinvention. For example, event processing system 100 can have othercapabilities or include other components that are not specificallydescribed. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize manyvariations, modifications, and alternatives.

FIG. 2 is a simplified block diagram that illustrates a functionalrepresentation of load balancing node 106 according to an embodiment ofthe present invention. As shown, load balancing node 106 can include anoverlapping partition adapter 200 and a sparse partitioner 202.

In various embodiments, overlapping partition adapter 200 is configuredto receive input events from source 102 and efficiently partition theevents among processing nodes 108-112 in a manner that takes intoaccount overlapping regions between the processing nodes. By way ofexample, consider an object moving across a 2D area, where a firstportion of the area is handled by processing node 108 and a second,overlapping portion of the area is handled by processing node 110.Assume that the object starts out at time T1 within the region handledby processing node 108, and at time T2 moves into the overlap areabetween node 108 and node 110. When this occurs, the event correspondingto the object should be inserted into the relation maintained byprocessing node 110 (so that it is “visible” to processing node 110),while also being updating in the relation maintained by processing node108. Further, assume that the object moves at time T3 entirely into theregion handled by node 110. At this point, the event corresponding tothe object should be deleted from the relation maintained by node 108while be updated in the relation maintained by node 110.

To accomplish the above, overlapping partition adapter 200 can carry outan algorithm in load balancing node 106 that appropriately inserts,updates, or deletes events to/from the relations maintained byprocessing nodes 108-112 to ensure that the processing nodes arecorrectly updated to track the movement of objects across the nodes. Incertain cases, this algorithm can cause an event corresponding to anobject to be inserted/updated in the relations of two or more processingnodes (if it is determined that the object is in an overlapping areabetween the nodes).

In a particular embodiment, overlapping partition adapter 200 canmaintain a bit vector for each processing node, where each bit vectorincludes a bit entry for each unique object being processing by system100. If the bit entry for a given object is set, that indicates that anevent corresponding to the object was previously inserted into therelation being handled by the processing node (and it is still there).If the bit entry is not set, that indicates that an event correspondingto the object has not yet been inserted into (or was deleted from) therelation being handled by the processing node. These bit vectors allowoverlapping partition adapter 200 to keep track of which processingnodes it has inserted events into, and which processing nodes it needsto update or delete a given event/object from. The details of thealgorithm performed by overlapping partition adapter 200 (and how itupdates these bit vectors) is described with respect to FIGS. 3-6 below.

Sparse partitioner 202 is an auxiliary component of load balancing node106 that is configured to identify “participating” processing nodes fora given input event/object. In other words, sparse partitioner 202 candetermine which processing nodes handle a spatial region that covers thecurrent location of a given object. In various embodiments, overlappingpartition adapter 200 can invoke sparse partitioner 202 to obtain a listof participating processing nodes for each input event or object and usethe list within its partitioning algorithm.

In one set of embodiments, sparse partitioner 202 can maintain an Rtreeindex that indexes bounding rectangles associated with the processingnodes. Each bounding rectangle can represent the spatial region handledby a particular node. Accordingly, when an input event is received,sparse partitioner 202 can use the coordinates for the object associatedwith the event to perform a search into the Rtree index and return alist or array of processing nodes whose bounding rectangle covers thecoordinates.

It should be appreciated that load balancing node 106 of FIG. 2 isillustrative and not intended to limit embodiments of the presentinvention. For example, load balancing node 106 can have othercapabilities or include other components that are not specificallydescribed. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize manyvariations, modifications, and alternatives.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a process 300 for partitioning aninput event stream among a plurality of processing nodes according to anembodiment of the present invention. In one set of embodiments, process300 can be carried out by overlapping partition adapter 200 of FIG. 2.Process 300 can be implemented in hardware, software, or a combinationthereof. As software, process 300 can be encoded as program code storedon a machine-readable storage medium.

At block 302, overlapping partition adapter 200 can receive an inputevent stream comprising a sequence of events, where the events representthe movement of a plurality of objects. For example, each event caninclude an identifier of an object, a current position (e.g.,coordinates) of the object, and a timestamp. In a particular embodiment,the events in the event stream can represent the movement of a verylarge number of objects (e.g., greater than one million).

At block 304, overlapping partition adapter 200 can partition the inputevent stream among a plurality of processing nodes (e.g., nodes 108-112of FIG. 1), where each node is configured to track objects within apredefined spatial region, and where the spatial regions for at leasttwo processing nodes overlap. As discussed above, this overlap enables asingle node to find, e.g., all of the objects within a particulardistance of a target object, even if the target object is in the processof moving from the region of that node to the overlapping region ofanother node.

FIG. 4 illustrates a flow 400 that can be executed by overlappingpartition adapter 200 as part of the processing of block 304 of FIG. 3.As shown in FIG. 4, for each event received in the event stream,overlapping partition adapter 200 can determine a list of participatingprocessing nodes for the object identified in the event (blocks 402,404). As discussed above, this determination can be carried out bypassing the position of the object to sparse partitioner 202 of FIG. 2.Sparse partitioner 202 can then use the object's position to perform asearch (e.g., an Rtree index search) of processing nodes whose spatialregion covers the object's position.

Upon receiving the list of participating processing nodes from sparsepartitioner 202, overlapping partition adapter 200 can iterate throughall of the processing nodes in the system and determine whether a givennode is a participating node (e.g., is in the list returned by sparsepartitioner 202) (blocks 406, 408). If a given node is a participatingnode, that means the object identified by the current event should betracked by the node. Accordingly, overlapping partition adapter 200 candetermine whether to insert or update the event into the relationmaintained by the node (block 410). If the node is not a participatingnode, that means the object identified by the event should not (orshould no longer) be tracked by the node. Accordingly, overlappingpartition adapter 200 can determine whether to delete the event from therelation maintained by the node (block 412).

Once the determination at block 410 or 412 is made, overlappingpartition adapter 200 can continue to iterate through all of theprocessing nodes, and repeat this loop for each incoming event (blocks414, 416).

FIG. 5 illustrates a flow 500 that can be executed by overlappingpartition adapter 200 as part of the processing of block 410 of FIG. 4.At block 502, overlapping partition adapter 200 can retrieve, from a bitvector stored for the current processing node, a bit value associatedwith the current object. As discussed above with respect to FIG. 2, abit vector is stored for each processing node in the system and reflectswhich objects are currently being tracked by the node.

If the bit value for the object is set (i.e., has a value of one),overlapping partition adapter 200 can transmit an updateevent command tothe processing node for updating the event in the relation (blocks 504,506). If the bit value for the object is not set (i.e., has a value ofzero), overlapping partition adapter 200 can transmit an inserteventcommand to the processing node for inserting the event into the relation(blocks 504, 508). Adapter 200 can then set the bit value (i.e., changethe value to one) to indicate that the processing node is now trackingthe object (block 510).

FIG. 6 illustrates a flow 600 that can be executed by overlappingpartition adapter 200 as part of the processing of block 412 of FIG. 4.Like block 502 of FIG. 5, overlapping partition adapter 200 canretrieve, from a bit vector stored for the current processing node, abit value associated with the current object (block 602). If the bitvalue for the object is set (i.e., has a value of one), overlappingpartition adapter 200 can transmit a deleteevent command to theprocessing node for deleting the event in the relation (blocks 604,606). The adapter can then clear the bit value (i.e., change the valueto zero) to indicate that the processing node is no longer tracking theobject (block 608). If the bit value for the object is not set (i.e.,has a value of zero), overlapping partition adapter 200 can do nothing(block 610).

It should be appreciated that the flow diagrams depicted in FIGS. 3-6are illustrative and that variations and modifications are possible.Steps described as sequential can be executed in parallel, order ofsteps can be varied, and steps can be modified, combined, added, oromitted. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize manyvariations, modifications, and alternatives.

Using the techniques described above, embodiments of the presentinvention can support very large scale moving object tracking in anevent processing system (e.g., greater than one million objects), whileusing a relatively small amount of working memory. For example, only 128Kilobytes of memory are needed per processing node (for the bit vector)for handling one million unique moving objects. Further, note that themodule for identifying participating nodes (i.e., sparse partitioner202) is separate from the insert/update/delete event processingperformed by overlapping partition adapter 200. Accordingly differenttypes of partitioning policies can be plugged into the system to supportdifferent spatial use cases.

FIG. 7 is a simplified block diagram illustrating a system environment700 that can be used in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention. As shown, system environment 700 can include one or moreclient computing devices 702, 704, 706, 708, which can be configured tooperate a client application such as a web browser, a UNIX/SOLARISterminal application, and/or the like. In one set of embodiments, clientcomputing devices 702, 704, 706, 708 may be configured to run one ormore client applications that interact with event processing system 100of FIG. 1.

Client computing devices 702, 704, 706, 708 can be general purposepersonal computers (e.g., personal computers and/or laptop computersrunning various versions of MICROSOFT WINDOWS and/or APPLE MACINTOSHoperating systems), cell phones or PDAs (running software such asMicrosoft Windows Mobile and being Internet, e-mail, SMS, Blackberry, orother communication protocol enabled), and/or workstation computersrunning any of a variety of commercially-available UNIX or UNIX-likeoperating systems (including without limitation the variety of GNU/Linuxoperating systems). Alternatively, client computing devices 702, 704,706, 708 can be any other electronic device capable of communicatingover a network, such as network 712 described below. Although systemenvironment 700 is shown with four client computing devices, it shouldbe appreciated that any number of client computing devices can besupported.

System environment 700 can further include a network 712. Network 712can be any type of network familiar to those skilled in the art that cansupport data communications using a network protocol, such as TCP/IP,SNA, IPX, AppleTalk, and the like. Merely by way of example, network 712can be a local area network (LAN), such as an Ethernet network, aToken-Ring network and/or the like; a wide-area network; a virtualnetwork, including without limitation a virtual private network (VPN);the Internet; an intranet; an extranet; a public switched telephonenetwork (PSTN); an infra-red network; a wireless network (e.g., anetwork operating under any of the IEEE 802.11 suite of protocols, theBluetooth protocol known in the art, and/or any other wirelessprotocol); and/or any combination of these and/or other networks.

System environment 700 can further include one or more server computers710 which can be general purpose computers, specialized server computers(including, e.g., PC servers, UNIX servers, mid-range servers, mainframecomputers, rack-mounted servers, etc.), server farms, server clusters,or any other appropriate arrangement and/or combination. Server 710 canrun an operating system including any of those discussed above, as wellas any commercially available server operating system. Server 710 canalso run any of a variety of server applications and/or mid-tierapplications, including web servers, FTP servers, CGI servers, JAVAvirtual machines, and the like. In one set of embodiments, server 710may correspond to a machine configured to run event processing system100 of FIG. 1.

System environment 700 can further include one or more databases 714. Inone set of embodiments, databases 714 can include databases that aremanaged by server 710 (e.g., database 108 of FIG. 1). Databases 714 canreside in a variety of locations. By way of example, databases 714 canreside on a storage medium local to (and/or resident in) one or more ofcomputers 702, 704, 706, 708, and 710. Alternatively, databases 714 canbe remote from any or all of computers 702, 704, 706, 708, and 710,and/or in communication (e.g., via network 712) with one or more ofthese. In one set of embodiments, databases 714 can reside in astorage-area network (SAN) familiar to those skilled in the art.

FIG. 8 is a simplified block diagram illustrating a computer system 800that can be used in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention. In various embodiments, computer system 800 can be used toimplement any of computers 702, 704, 706, 708, and 710 described withrespect to system environment 700 above. As shown, computer system 800can include hardware elements that are electrically coupled via a bus824. The hardware elements can include one or more central processingunits (CPUs) 802, one or more input devices 804 (e.g., a mouse, akeyboard, etc.), and one or more output devices 806 (e.g., a displaydevice, a printer, etc.). Computer system 800 can also include one ormore storage devices 808. By way of example, the storage device(s) 808can include devices such as disk drives, optical storage devices, andsolid-state storage devices such as a random access memory (RAM) and/ora read-only memory (ROM), which can be programmable, flash-updateableand/or the like.

Computer system 800 can additionally include a computer-readable storagemedia reader 812, a communications subsystem 814 (e.g., a modem, anetwork card (wireless or wired), an infra-red communication device,etc.), and working memory 818, which can include RAM and ROM devices asdescribed above. In some embodiments, computer system 800 can alsoinclude a processing acceleration unit 816, which can include a digitalsignal processor (DSP), a special-purpose processor, and/or the like.

Computer-readable storage media reader 812 can be connected to acomputer-readable storage medium 810, together (and, optionally, incombination with storage device(s) 808) comprehensively representingremote, local, fixed, and/or removable storage devices plus storagemedia for temporarily and/or more permanently containingcomputer-readable information. Communications system 814 can permit datato be exchanged with network 712 and/or any other computer describedabove with respect to system environment 700.

Computer system 800 can also comprise software elements, shown as beingcurrently located within working memory 818, including an operatingsystem 820 and/or other code 822, such as an application program (whichmay be a client application, Web browser, middle tier/serverapplication, etc.). It should be appreciated that alternativeembodiments of computer system 800 can have numerous variations fromthat described above. For example, customized hardware can be used andparticular elements can be implemented in hardware, software, or both.Further, connection to other computing devices such as networkinput/output devices can be employed.

Computer readable storage media for containing code, or portions ofcode, executable by computer system 800 can include any appropriatemedia known or used in the art, such as but not limited tovolatile/non-volatile and removable/non-removable media. Examples ofcomputer-readable storage media include RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory,CD-ROM, digital versatile disk (DVD) or other optical storage, magneticcassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magneticstorage devices, an any other medium that can be used to store dataand/or program code and that can be accessed by a computer.

Although specific embodiments of the invention have been describedabove, various modifications, alterations, alternative constructions,and equivalents are within the scope of the invention. For example,embodiments of the present invention are not restricted to operationwithin certain specific data processing environments, but are free tooperate within a plurality of data processing environments. Further,although embodiments of the present invention have been described withrespect to certain flow diagrams and steps, it should be apparent tothose skilled in the art that the scope of the present invention is notlimited to the described diagrams/steps.

Yet further, although embodiments of the present invention have beendescribed using a particular combination of hardware and software, itshould be recognized that other combinations of hardware and softwareare also within the scope of the present invention.

The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in anillustrative rather than restrictive sense. It will be evident thatadditions, subtractions, and other modifications may be made thereuntowithout departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention asset forth in the following claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method comprising: receiving, by a computersystem, an event stream comprising a sequence of events representingmovement of a plurality of objects, the event stream including a firstevent of the sequence of events, and the first event being associatedwith a first object of the plurality of objects; and partitioning, bythe computer system, the event stream among a plurality of processingnodes to facilitate parallel tracking of the plurality of objects usinga plurality of bit vectors that correspond to the plurality ofprocessing nodes, each of the plurality of bit vectors comprising aplurality of bit values corresponding to the plurality of objects. 2.The method of claim 1, wherein: the plurality of processing nodesoperate upon a plurality of spatial-region-representing relations,wherein each event of the sequence of events includes an identifier ofthe associated object and a current spatial position of the object, andwherein the partitioning the event stream comprises, for each event inthe sequence of events: determining a subset of processing nodes in theplurality of processing nodes configured to track objects in apredefined spatial region that encompasses the current position of theobject; and for each processing node in the plurality of processingnodes: determining whether the processing node is in the subset; whenthe processing node is in the subset, determining whether to cause theevent to be inserted or updated in a first spatial-region-representingrelation operated on by the processing node; and when the processingnode is not in the subset, determining whether to cause the event to bedeleted from the first spatial-region-representing relation operated onby the processing node.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein determiningwhether to cause the event to be inserted or updated in the firstspatial-region-representing relation operated on by the processing nodecomprises: retrieving, from a bit vector associated with the processingnode, a bit value associated with the object; when the bit value is afirst value: transmitting to the processing node a command for insertingthe event into the first spatial-region-representing relation; andsetting the bit value to a second value; and when the bit value is thesecond value, transmitting a command to the processing node for updatingthe event in the first spatial-region-representing relation.
 4. Themethod of claim 3, wherein the first value is zero, and wherein thesecond value is one.
 5. The method of claim 2, wherein determiningwhether to delete the event from the relation operated on by theprocessing node comprises: retrieving, from a bit vector stored for theprocessing node, a bit value associated with the object; and when thebit value is a second value: transmitting to the processing node acommand for deleting the event from the relation; and setting the bitvalue to a first value.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the secondvalue is one, and wherein the first value is zero.
 7. The method ofclaim 1, wherein partitioning the event stream further comprises:determining, by the computer system, a first bit value of a first bitvector of the plurality of bit vectors that is associated with a firstprocessing node of the plurality of processing nodes, the first bitvalue being associated with the first object; and determining, by thecomputer system, a type of the command to be sent to the firstprocessing node based on the first bit value.
 8. The method of claim 7,wherein the event stream further includes a second event of the sequenceof events that is also associated with the first object, wherein thepartitioning further includes: determining, by the computer system,using a second bit value of the first bit vector, that the firstprocessing node is currently tracking the first object; andtransmitting, by the computer system, another command to the firstprocessing node for deleting one or more events associated with thefirst object from a first spatial-region-representing relation operatedupon by the first processing node.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein thecomputer system is a load balancing node of an event processing system.10. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of objects are motorvehicles.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein each processing node of theplurality of processing nodes is configured to track an object in theplurality of objects in a predefined spatial region, and wherein thepredefined spatial region for at least two processing nodes in theplurality of processing nodes overlap, wherein the predefined spatialregions for the plurality of processing nodes are one-dimensional,two-dimensional, or three-dimensional regions.
 12. A non-transitorycomputer readable medium having stored thereon program code executableby a processor, the program code comprising: code that causes theprocessor to receive an event stream comprising a sequence of events,the sequence of events representing movement of a plurality of objects,the event stream including a first event of the sequence of events, andthe first event being associated with a first object of the plurality ofobjects; and code that causes the processor to partition the eventstream among a plurality of processing nodes to facilitate paralleltracking of the plurality of objects using a plurality of bit vectorsthat correspond to the plurality of processing nodes, each of theplurality of bit vectors comprising a plurality of bit valuescorresponding to the plurality of objects.
 13. The non-transitorycomputer readable medium of claim 12, wherein the code that causes theprocessor to partition the event stream further comprises: code thatcauses the processor to identify a first bit value of a first bit vectorcorresponding to the first processing node, the first bit value beingassociated with the first object; and code that causes the processor todetermine a type of the command to be sent to the first processing nodebased on the first bit value.
 14. The non-transitory computer readablemedium of claim 13, wherein the event stream further includes a secondevent of the sequence of events that is also associated with the firstobject, wherein the code that causes the processor to partition theevent stream further includes: code that causes the processor todetermine using a second bit value of the first bit vector, that thefirst processing node is currently tracking the first object; and codethat causes the processor to transmit another command to the firstprocessing node for deleting one or more events associated with thefirst object from a first spatial-region-representing relation operatedupon by the first processing node.
 15. The non-transitory computerreadable medium of claim 12, wherein the plurality of objects are motorvehicles.
 16. An event processing system comprising: a load balancernode; and a plurality of processing nodes, wherein the load balancernode is configured to: receive an event stream comprising a sequence ofevents, the sequence of events representing movement of a plurality ofobjects, the event stream including a first event of the sequence ofevents, and the first event being associated with a first object of theplurality of objects; partition the event stream among a plurality ofprocessing nodes to facilitate parallel tracking of the plurality ofobjects using a plurality of bit vectors that correspond to theplurality of processing nodes, each of the plurality of bit vectorscomprising a plurality of bit values corresponding to the plurality ofobjects.
 17. The event processing system of claim 16, whereinpartitioning the event stream further comprises: identifying, by thecomputer system, a first bit value of a first bit vector correspondingto the first processing node, the first bit value being associated withthe first object; and determining, by the computer system, a type of thecommand to be sent to the first processing node based on the first bitvalue.
 18. The event processing system of claim 17, wherein the eventstream further includes a second event of the sequence of events that isalso associated with the first object, wherein the partitioning furtherincludes: determining using a second bit value of the first bit vector,that the first processing node is currently tracking the first object;and transmitting, by the computer system, another command to the firstprocessing node for deleting one or more events associated with thefirst object from a first spatial-region-representing relation operatedupon by the first processing node.
 19. The event processing system ofclaim 16, wherein the load balancer node and the plurality of processingnodes correspond to separate processors of a single computer system. 20.The event processing system of claim 16, wherein the load balancer nodeand the plurality of processing nodes correspond to separate computersystems.